References

Aziz AM Infection prevention and control: steps to take in your home. Nurs Resid Care. 2016; 18:(9)462-463 https://doi.org/10.12968/nrec.2016.18.9.462

Cousins G Role of environmental cleanliness and decontamination in care homes. Nurs Stand. 2014; 30:(19) https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.19.39.s42

Department of Health. Health Building Note 00-09: infection control in the built environment. 2013. https://tinyurl.com/y7gwg3my (accessed 20 October 2018)

Department of Health. The Health and Social Care Act 2008. Code of practice for the prevention and control of infection. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/ydchynp8 (accessed 13 December 2018)

Garvey MI, Winfield J, Wiley C Reduction in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation: impact of a screening and decolonisation programme. J Infect Prev. 2016; 17:(6)294-297 https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177416661406

Gould D, Drey N Student nurses' experiences of infection control during clinical placements. Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41:(9)760-763 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.01.025

Higginson R Infection control in the community. Br J Community Nurs. 2018; 23:(12)590-595 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2018.23.12.590

Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Improving care in residential care homes: a literature review. 2008. https://tinyurl.com/yapuswx4 (accessed 13 December 2018)

Care homes for older people, 29th edn. 2018

Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratta RJ epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect. 2014; 86:S1-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(13)60012-2

Maharaj D, Lawton B, Garrett S Poor compliance with standard precautions against infections during minor surgical gynaecological procedures. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 52:(3)262-265 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01433.x

Nasa P, Juneja D, Singh O Severe sepsis and septic shock in the elderly: an overview. World J Crit Care Med. 2012; 1:(1)23-30 https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v1.i1.23

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Infection control, prevention of healthcare-associated infection in primary and community care. 2012. https://tinyurl.com/kbjz3ob (accessed 17 December 2018)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Epic3 guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections. 2018a. https://tinyurl.com/ycw5g9qn (accessed 20 October 2018)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Helping to prevent infection: a quick guide for managers and staff in care homes. 2018b. http://tinyurl.com/y7xc6e2z (accessed 17 December 2018)

Pellowe C, Pratt R, Harper P Infection control: prevention of healthcare-associated infection in primary and community care. J Hosp Infect. 2003; 55:1-127

Ward D Microbiology and infection prevention and control for nursing students.London: Sage; 2016

Infection prevention in care homes: the role of community nurses

02 January 2019
Volume 24 · Issue 1

Abstract

Community nurses are often in the position of providing clinical services to residents in the care home sector. In doing so, they need to consider the factors that increase the risk of infection in these residents and how these might be addressed. They also need to be mindful of the collaborative approach required and any training needs of staff working there in relation to services they have provided.

According to the latest LaingBuisson survey (2018), there are 416 000 people over the age of 65 years living in care homes in the UK. As part of their registration requirements, care homes have to meet the standards set down by the Care Quality Commission, including those relating to infection prevention and control. Regulation 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations (2014) relates to people not receiving unsafe care and treatment and the prevention of avoidable harm and risk of harm. These standards also apply to community nurses who visit residents in care homes for clinical purposes, for example, for wound dressing, catheterisation and syringe driver management. A subsection of this regulation states that care providers are responsible for ‘assessing the risk of, and preventing, detecting and controlling the spread of, infections, including those that are healthcare associated’. It points people to the Code of Practice relating to the prevention and control of infection, which comes from the earlier mentioned Act (Department of Health (DH), 2015). This article aims to discuss the specific risks for infection in the care home setting and highlights the responsibilities of community nurses in assessing and minimising these risks in their interactions with this patient group.

Risk factors for infection

While anyone can acquire an infection, there are some people who are at higher risk, either because of factors specific to the patients or because of the setting within which they find themselves being cared for.

Patient-specific factors include the following (Ward, 2016):

  • Age: Patients who are very old or very young are at higher risk of acquiring an infection. Older patients are also at higher risk of developing sepsis as a result of infection
  • Chronic conditions: Some conditions predispose patients to higher risk of infection. These include diabetes, kidney disease and liver disease
  • Nutritional status: Some of the nutrients that we need to maintain health ensure that the immune system functions effectively. When patients are deficient in these nutrients, not only are they at a higher risk of infection but their bodies might also have more difficulty in fighting the infection. Nutrients needed for a healthy immune system include certain vitamins and minerals
  • Medication: Some medication that patients require for existing conditions increase the risk of infection as they affect the functioning of the immune system. An example of this is steroidal medications that people might use for respiratory conditions or arthritis
  • The presence of an invasive device: Some patients require devices such as urinary catheters, tracheostomy tubes and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tubes, which increase the risk of infection. They provide a port of access to the body leading to infections in the urinary, respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts
  • The presence of open wounds: Wounds such as leg ulcers and pressure ulcers also provide a port of access for microbes into the body, whereby they can even enter the bloodstream, which can lead to both wound and blood-stream infections and increase the risk of sepsis
  • Impaired immunity: Some patients have an impaired immune system because of certain medication, medical or health conditions or treatment such as chemotherapy. This leaves them at higher risk of acquiring infections, both from external microbes and their own normal flora (endogenous sources).

  • Type Method of action Discussion
    Alcohol-based handrub solution The majority of alcohol-based hand antiseptics contain either isopropanol, ethanol, n-propanol, or a combination of two of these products. Studies have found that sanitizers with an alcohol concentration between 60 and 95% are more effective in killing bacteria than those with a lower alcohol concentration or non-alcohol-based sanitizers. Fast acting and useful where additional, rapid hand cleansing is required. The presence of alcohol offers additional protection against contamination when compared to alcohol-free solutions. Alcohol hand gel products can come in a gel form or a more liquid form. Placed onto dry hands, where hands are not visibly contaminated, they provide an additional method for ensuring hands are clean before proceeding with clinical care.
    Antimicrobial foam solutions Alcohol free, antimicrobial foam solutions often contain Benzalkonium Chloride 0.1%: Didecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Chloride 0.25% and are effective against bacteria and viruses. Foam solutions include moisturising agents for the skin's protection. In addition, the advantage of foam hand sanitizer is that the product clings to hands during the application and does not easily slide off the hands like gel hand sanitizers can.
    Alcohol-free handrub solutions Alcohol-free preparations use agents other than alcohol to kill microorganisms, such as povidone-iodine, benzalkonium chloride or triclosan. Because these are alcohol-free they may be susceptible to contamination, although this is controversial. Some evidence claims that although susceptible to contamination they offer longer protection against certain bacteria once applied. Used when alcohol based solutions aren't available or contraindicated—such as when the skin is dry or inflamed.
    Chlorhexidine solutions Chlorhexidine has a bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity and acts more slowly on the hands than alcohol solutions. It has a wide antimicrobial activity. Alcohol-based hand hygiene product containing chlorhexidine gluconate are superior to other solely alcohol-based hand sanitisers in effective hand disinfection.
    Iodine solutions Iodine solutions have a long history of effectiveness against bacterial contamination. Iodine's use is limited due to staining of the skin and skin irritation. Its use has been superseded by Chlorhexidine and alcohol-based solutions.

    Source: (Pellowe et al, 2003; NICE, 2012; Loveday et al, 2014; Department of Health, 2013; Cousins, 2014; Aziz, 2016; NICE, 2018a; NICE, 2018b; Higginson, 2018)

    There are several sources of infections in care homes (Ward, 2016), including:

  • Shared equipment: In environments such as care homes, equipment such as hoists, wheelchairs and standing aids may be shared between residents, and these can be sources of infection if the correct decontamination procedures are not followed
  • Other residents or staff members with infections: It is common for patients to share certain areas of a care home, such as dining rooms and lounges, with other people who themselves may have infections. Additionally, care home staff may continue to work despite having an infection as they may be concerned about taking time off. Further, it may be the case that because of their age, previous hospitalisations and antibiotic usage, a significant proportion of residents are carriers of microbes such as methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Garvey et al, 2016). Thus, other residents, especially those with open wounds, are at risk of getting infected with these microbes
  • Mass catering: When cooking for a large number of people, staff need to ensure that they adhere to good practice in both preparation and serving, including good hand hygiene and the use of the correct knives and chopping boards for different food groups
  • Staff compliance issues: It is well documented that the compliance of healthcare workers with infection prevention and control precautions can be low (Gould and Drey, 2013; Maharaj et al, 2012). This can lead to an increased risk of cross-infection in healthcare settings, with patients acquiring avoidable infections.
  • Standard and transmission-based precautions

    Standard principles for infection prevention and control apply in all cases when dealing with blood, other body fluids and mucous membranes. These include appropriate and timely hand hygiene, the use of protective clothing such as gloves and aprons, appropriate sharps management and management of blood and body fluid spillages. In addition, the use of an aseptic non-touch technique is required for some clinical procedures carried out by community nurses in care homes, such as urinary catheterisation and wound management. Transmission-based precautions are those based on the route of transmission of the infection that a patient has or is suspected to have. These routes are categorised as contact, airborne or droplet. This would mean, for example, that if a resident has a wound with an MRSA infection, contact precautions should be applied, since this organism spreads through contact. Community nurses can assist with precautions both by applying them in their own work with care home residents and by encouraging other staff to comply through education and role modelling.

    The role of the community nurse

    One element referred to in the Code of Practice (DH, 2015) is that all patients should be assessed for their infection risk. In terms of the community nurse, this encompasses risks to the patient from themselves and others and risks to staff from the patient and environment. Staff members can reduce risks to themselves through the use of standard and transmission-based precautions during clinical procedures with the residents for whom they are caring. When providing care to care home residents, community nurses are, in effect, visitors who are not employed by the specific care home but provide certain nursing services to them, either because it is residential in nature and there is no nurse on site, or because the nurses on site have not been trained to carry out the procedures. In addition, in homes that provide both nursing and residential services, on-site nurses may not be in a position to provide the service needed, because of issues related to registration, insurance etc. Thus community nursing input would be required. This places community nurses in a precarious position at times, as there may be a conflict between their standards and those applied by the staff in the care home. In 2008, research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation showed that there was an opportunity for a more strategic approach to the provision of nursing support to residential homes. This can be sporadic, and interactions may occur more by default than by design and appropriate planning. There is reliance on both sides on staff applying all required infection prevention precautions to minimise risk of infection and cross-infection. Community nurses may need to provide appropriate education to care staff about minimising risks to specific patients, such as those with invasive devices and wound dressings managed by the nurses, and about aspects such as infection risks, ensuring optimum nutritional status and improving compliance with infection precautions. However, care staff are the ones responsible for the overall care of the residents. These situations need partnership working in order to ensure that infection and cross-infection do not occur in residents being seen by the community nurse. Such nurses have a busy workload, but the time dedicated toward communicating with and teaching care staff is well spent if it prevents infections, particularly considering the higher risk of sepsis in older patients and those with urinary tract infections (Nasa et al, 2012). Community nurses can provide a good quality service to care homes by adopting strategies to minimise infection risk. In addition, funding and management support as well as a positive collaborative link between community nurses and the staff working in care homes are vital for infection control.

    Key Points

  • There are several risk factors for infection among care home residents
  • Community nurses have an important role to play in infection prevention in care homes
  • Community nurses need to work collaboratively with care home staff to minimise the infection risks to residents.