References

Bate P. Context is everything. In: Perspectives on context.London: Health Foundation; 2014

Brown DK, Fosnight S, Whitford M Interprofessional education model for geriatric falls risk assessment and prevention. BMJ Open Qual. 2018; 7 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000417

Goulder T, Kar P. Facilitating diabetes care—a community approach. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013; 2:(1) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u201112.w708

Horton T, Illingworth J, Warburton W. The spread challenge.London: Health Foundation; 2018

Lucas B, Nacer H. The habits of an improver.London: Health Foundation; 2015

Ovretveit J. How does context affect quality improvement? In: Perspectives on context.London: Health Foundation; 2014

Pringle A, Finucane A, Oxenham D. Improving electronic information sharing for palliative care patients. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014; 3 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u201904.w1014

Robert G, Fulop N. The role of context in successful improvement. In Perspectives on context.London: Health Foundation; 2014

Sanders J, Fitzpatrick JM. Improving service user self-management: development and implementation of a strategy for the Richmond Response and Rehabilitation Team. BMJ Open Qual. 2017; 6 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000126

Improving service delivery

02 March 2019
Volume 24 · Issue 3

Achallenge facing the NHS is how to transfer innovations and improvements from one organisation to another and thereby reduce variations in service delivery (Horton et al, 2018). Sometimes, this merely reflects the slow spread of successful innovations, but at others, factors such as culture, staff skills and established habits affect their successful replication in another setting (Horton et al, 2018). It is not simply the innovation and its implementation but also the context and interaction between these elements that influence success.

Context is a set of factors that affect improvement efforts and may not be easily modifiable. Bate (2014) argued that it has four measurable dimensions—strategic, cultural, technical and structural—and inadequacy in any one affects prolonged significant improvements and sustained learning. Robert and Fulop (2014) identified multiple levels of context (micro, meso and macro) and examined how they combine to affect the sustained success of quality improvement. Following up, Ovretveit (2014) identified critical conditions for an improvement to be successful; these vary depending upon the innovation, and different elements of the context affect different types of innovations. Horton et al (2018) suggested that the ‘replicability problem’ can be solved if teams adapt and implement innovations to work in their own settings. Thus, new technologies, practices and models of care must be sympathetically adapted to the specific context with the engagement of all those affected if they are to be successfully implemented and sustained. Perhaps it would be helpful if there were ‘spread programmes’ to enable the successful cascade of innovations.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Community Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for district and community nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month