References

Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy. Urology. 2005; 65:(4)740-744 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.061

Anderson CA, Omar MI, Campbell SE, Hunter KF, Cody JD, Glazener CM. Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001843.pub5

Attar KH, Gurung P, Hamid R, Wood S, Shah PJR. Polydimethylsiloxane in the treatment of sphincter weakness incontinence in men with spinal cord injury: long-term follow-up. Br J Med Surg Urol. 2008; 1:63-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjmsu.2008.05.011

Barnard J, Westenberg AM. The penile clamp: medieval pain or make-shift gain?. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015; 34:(2)115-116 https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22597

Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hübner W Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2011; 59:(6)985-996 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.020

Bauer RM, Grabbert MT, Klehr B 36-month data for the AdVance XP® male sling: results of a prospective multicentre study. BJU Int. 2017; 119:626-630 https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13704

EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence in adults. 2018. http://tinyurl.com/y585yedj (accessed 21 February 2019)

Cancer Research UK. Prostate cancer statistics. 2018. http://tinyurl.com/yyl3hwnx (accessed 15 January 2019)

Fader MJ, Cottenden AM, Gage HM Individual budgets for people with incontinence: results from a ‘shopping’ experiment within the British National Health Service. Health Expect. 2014; 17:(2)186-196 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00750.x

Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2005; 48:(5)734-738 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.004

Parker WR, Wang R, He C, Wood DP Five year expanded prostate cancer index composite-based quality of life outcomes after prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2011; 107:(4)585-590 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09579.x

Pompe RS, Tian Z, Preisser F Short- and long-term functional outcomes and quality of life after radical prostatectomy: patient reported outcomes from a tertiary high-volume center. Eur Urol Focus. 2017; 3:(6)615-620 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.08.001

Imamoglu MA, Tuygun C, Bakirtas H, Yiğitbasi O, Kiper A. The comparison of artificial urinary sphincter implantation and endourethral macroplastique injection for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2005; 47:(2)209-213 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.019

Kirchin V, Page T, Keegan PE, Atiemo K, Cody JD, McClinton S. Urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003881.pub3

Kowalczyk JJ, Snabsigh R, Scott FB. Experience with the artificial urinary sphincter model AMS800 in 148 patients. J Urol. 1989; 141

Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Antenor JA, Han M, Catalona WJ. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2004; 172:(6 Pt 1)2227-2231

Meisterhofer K, Herzog S, Strini KA, Sebastianelli L, Bauer R, Dalpiaz O. Male slings for postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.008

Mitchell N. Long term urinary catheter problems: a flow chart to aid management. Br J Community Nurs. 2008; 13:(1)6-12 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2008.13.1.27977

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management. CG175. 2014. http://tinyurl.com/hxw43js (accessed 1 February 2019)

The British Association of Urological Surgeons. Halt on use of surgical mesh for SUI. 2018. http://tinyurl.com/y5zrr72b (accessed 1 February 2019)

Wei JT, Dunn RL, Marcovich R, Montie JE, Sanda MG. Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2000; 164:(3 Pt 1)744-748

Post-prostatectomy incontinence: multimodal modern-day management

02 April 2019
Volume 24 · Issue 4

Abstract

As the rate of prostate cancer detection increases, so does the rate at which radical prostatectomy is performed. Post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) or urine leakage affects around 20% of men who undergo this procedure. Although affected individuals must be supported in maintaining hygiene with the use of urine capture devices, definitive treatment should also be offered if appropriate. A range of management options are available, from incontinence pads to artificial urinary sphincters. However, an understanding of the aetiology of the leak as well as patient factors is vital if the correct treatment option is to be selected. This article describes the potential causes of PPI and explores management options for this condition.

Every year, nearly 50 000 men in the UK are newly diagnosed with prostate cancer, and this is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men (Cancer Research UK, 2018). Radical prostatectomy, which is the surgical removal of the prostate, is a popular treatment option for patients in whom the cancer has not spread beyond the prostate (i.e. the disease is localised). Although curing the cancer is paramount, the survivor's quality of life can be negatively affected by urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction after a prostatectomy. In order to support men with post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI), medical and nursing staff should understand the multimodal nature of treatment options, as well as which factors influence successful treatment outcomes and have a low side effect profile.

Most men will experience some urinary leakage immediately after their catheter is removed and in the first months after prostatectomy. Continence improves with time, but usually plateaus at 12 months after surgery (Parker et al, 2011). Long-term PPI rates vary in the literature from 11 to 69%, depending on patient and surgical factors as well as how the incontinence is defined and measured (Wei et al, 2000; Pompe et al, 2017).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Community Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for district and community nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month