References

The importance of nutrition in wound healing. 2013. https://tinyurl.com/4spex5ct (accessed 23 September 2021)

Beitz AJ, Newman A, Kahn AR, Ruggles T, Eikmejer L. A polymeric membrane dressing with antinociceptive properties: analysis with a rodent model of stab wound secondary hyperalgesia. J Pain. 2004; 5:(1)38-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2003.09.003

Benskin LL. Polymeric membrane dressing for topical wound management of patients with infected wounds in a challenging environment: a protocol with 3 cases examples. Ostomy Wound Management. 2016; 62:(5)42-50

When is wound cleansing necessary and what solution should be used. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/ythyxbma (accessed 22 September 2021)

Cutting K, Vowden P, Wiegand C. Wound inflammation and the role of multifunctional polymeric membrane dressing. Wounds Int. 2015; 6:(2)41-46

PolyMem® made easy. 2015a. https://tinyurl.com/5y4kndz4 (accessed 22 September 2021)

Dudfield L, Upton P. Personality and wellbeing in people living with a chronic wound. Wounds Int. 2019; 10:(4)13-16

Edwards J. Dealing with wound-related pain at dressing change. J Community Nurs. 2013; 27:(4)36-42

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: quick reference guide. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/5h6cmzrj (accessed 27 September 2021)

European Wound Management Association. Managing wounds as a team. A joint position document by AAWC, AWMA and EWMA in collaboration with IWGDF. 2014. https://tinyurl.com/t6ebecf4 (accessed 22 September 2021)

Gibson E, Stephens C. Performance and ease of use evaluation of new surgical post-operative dressings in 14 patients undergoing elective gynaecological surgery. J Tissue Viability. 2013; 22:(2)37-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2013.02.001

Guest JF, Vowden K. Vowden P. The health economics burden the acute and chronic wounds impose on an average clinical commissioning group/health board in the UK. J Wound Care. 2017; 26:(6)292-303 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.6.292

Guest JF, Fuller GW, Vowden P Cohort study evaluating the burden to the UK on the National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013. BMJ Open. 2020; 10:(12) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-0045253

Halim AS, Khoo TL, Mat Saad AZ. Wound bed preparation from a clinical perspective. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012; 45:(2)193-202 https://doi.org/10.4103%2F0970-0358.101277

Kahn AR. A superficial cutaneous dressing inhibits inflammation and swelling in deep tissues. Pain Med. 2000; 1:(2) https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4637.2000.000024.x

Kapp S, Miller C, Santamaria N. The quality of life of people who have chronic wounds and who self-treat. J Clin Nurs. 2018; 27:(1-2)182-192 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13870

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Prontosan for acute and chronic wounds. Medtech innovation briefing [MIB220]. 2020. https://tinyurl.com/5a7jbh9w (accessed 23 September 2021)

National Wound Care Strategy Programme. NWCSP progress report 2019-20. 2020. https://tinyurl.com/yy2s6t2p (accessed 22 September 2021)

NHS. Stop the pressure. 2012. https://tinyurl.com/cp5cpzb4 (accessed 22 September 2021)

NHS England. NHS Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) guidance 2017-2019. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/323xx5hv (accessed 22 September 2021)

NHS Improvement. Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT). 2017. https://tinyurl.com/h38ef62j (accessed 22 September 2021)

Okur ME, Karantas ID, Şenyiğit Z, Okur NU, Siafaka PI. Recent trends on wound management: new therapeutic choices based on polymeric carriers. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2020; 15:(6)661-684 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2019.11.008

How to decrease pain associated with wound dressing changes. 2013. https://tinyurl.com/fntpmbdu (accessed 23 September 2021)

Van Tiggelen H, LeBlanc K, Campbell K Standardizing the classification of skin tears: validity and reliability testing of the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel Classification System in 44 countries. Br J Dermatol. 2020; 183:(1)146-154 https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fbjd.18604

Wounds UK. Effective exudate management. Best practice statement. 2013. https://tinyurl.com/y9492nw2 (accessed 22 September 2021)

Achieving effective patient outcomes with PolyMem® Silicone Border

02 October 2021
Volume 26 · Issue 10
Figure 1. Mode of action of PolyMem range of dressings
Figure 1. Mode of action of PolyMem range of dressings

Abstract

Clinicians are under increasing pressure to provide high-quality patient outcomes at a reduced cost. Increasingly, community staff must acquire knowledge on advanced wound care products to cope with the growing caseload demands. This article describes the use of PolyMem® dressings to reduce pain, inflammation, oedema and bruising and their ability to debride and absorb exudate while providing an optimum healing environment. The PolyMem range includes multifunctional dressings for various painful chronic wounds. This article also presents five case studies with particularly good patient outcomes where PolyMem dressings were the primary dressing. All five patients were holistically assessed to enable consistent evidence-based treatment decisions. In four cases, the new PolyMem Silicone Border dressing was used. The patients found the PolyMem Silicone Border dressing comfortable and gentle on removal even when the skin was extremely fragile. The right dressing used at the right time on the right patient can improve patient outcomes.

Wound management continues to present complex challenges for clinicians, and numerous factors are involved in achieving appropriate and effective wound care (Gibson and Stephens, 2013). Several national frameworks have been introduced to improve patient outcomes, efficiencies and cost effectiveness, while addressing suboptimal wound care, including the National Wound Care Strategy Programme (NWCSP) (2020), Getting it Right First Time (NHS Improvement, 2017) and Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (NHS England, 2021).

Every year, new products are introduced into the dressings market. As far back as 2017/2018, the annual cost to the NHS for managing wounds was £8.3 billion, of which £2.7 billion and £5.6 billon were the costs associated with managing healed and unhealed wounds, respectively (Guest et al, 2020). Therefore, cost effectiveness and measurable clinical outcomes have become a strategic focus, although cost is not the only issue that should be considered when choosing a dressing; patient acceptability of the products is equally important. Wound treatment modalities should be selected based not only on their ability to facilitate healing but also on their impact on patient quality of life (QoL) (Kapp et al, 2018).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Community Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for district and community nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month