References

Azevedo AS, Almeida C, Melo LF, Azevedo NF. Interaction between atypical microorganisms and E. coli in catheter-associated urinary tract biofilms. Biofouling. 2014; 30:(8)893-902 https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2014.944173

Azevedo AS, Almeida C, Melo LF, Azevedo NF. Impact of polymicrobial biofilms in catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2017; 43:(4)423-439 https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2016.1240656

Bajic P, Van Kuiken ME, Burge BK Male bladder microbiome relates to lower urinary tract symptoms. European Urology Focus. 2020; 6:(2)376-382 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.08.001

Biehl LM, Farowski F, Hilpert C ongitudinal variability in the urinary microbiota of healthy premenopausal women and the relation to neighboring microbial communities: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2022; 17:(1) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262095

Bossa L, Kline K, McDougald D, Lee BB, Rice SA. Urinary catheter-associated microbiota change in accordance with treatment and infection status. PLoS One. 2017; 12:(6) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177633

Forster CS, Panchapakesan K, Stroud C, Banerjee P, Gordish-Dressman H, Hsieh MH. A cross-sectional analysis of the urine microbiome of children with neuropathic bladders. J Pediatr Urol. 2020; 16:(5)593.e1-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.02.005

Gaston JR, Johnson AO, Bair KL, White AN, Armbruster CE, Ottemann KM. Polymicrobial interactions in the urinary tract: is the enemy of my enemy my friend?. Infection and Immunity. 2021; 89:(4) https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00652-20

Jacobs KM, Thomas-White KJ, Hilt EE, Wolfe AJ, Waters TP. Microorganisms identified in the maternal bladder: discovery of the maternal bladder microbiota. AJP Rep. 2017; 7:(3)e188-196 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606860

Karstens L, Asquith M, Davin S Does the urinary microbiome play a role in urgency urinary incontinence and its severity?. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016; 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2016.00078

Perez-Carrasco V, Soriano-Lerma A, Soriano M, Gutiérrez-Fernández J, Garcia-Salcedo JA. Urinary microbiome: yin and yang of the urinary tract. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021; 11 https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffcimb.2021.617002

Shuman EK, Chenoweth CE. Urinary catheter-associated infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2018; 32:(4)885-897 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2018.07.002

Sidaway P. The urinary microbiota is unique and resilient. Nat Rev Urol. 2017; 14:(9) https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.116

Yoo J-J, Shin HB, Song JS Urinary microbiome characteristics in female patients with acute uncomplicated cystitis and recurrent cystitis. J Clin Med. 2021; 10:(5) https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051097

Recent insights into catheter-related urinary tract infections

02 April 2022
Volume 27 · Issue 4

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) commonly develop in people with urinary catheters. Inserting a catheter can damage the urothelial barrier and trigger the formation of a biofilm on the catheter that allows bacteria direct access to the bladder. Biofilms also protect bacteria from the immune system and reduce antibiotic effectiveness. In addition, a growing literature suggests that the urinary tract harbours bacteria even in people with negative conventional cultures. The urinary microbiome is highly individual. Nevertheless, changes in the urinary microbiome may identify individuals at risk of UTIs and, for example, suggest that a catheter should be replaced more frequently and, in turn, avoid the need for antibiotics. This article outlines the importance of biofilms in the development of catheter-related UTIs and introduces the urinary microbiome.

Regular micturition, the physical barrier provided by urothelial cells and mucin, and the immune system usually prevent bacteria from colonising the urethra and, in turn, the bladder (Gaston et al, 2021). Catheterisation can undermine these defences and may lead to urinary tract infections (UTIs) (Gaston et al, 2021). On average, between 3–10% of people with a catheter develop bacteriuria each day (Shuman and Chenoweth, 2018). Biofilms are central to the development of catheter-related UTIs.

Inserting a catheter can damage the urothelial barrier and trigger immune responses. As a result, the patient may deposit proteins (eg fibrinogen) onto the catheter surface (Gaston et al, 2021). Moreover, inserting a catheter can disrupt micturition. Therefore, patients may retain urine in the bladder, which facilitates microbial growth (Gaston et al, 2021). The flow of warm urine, which is nutrient rich, means that free-floating bacteria attach to the catheter aided by the protein deposited on the tube's surface (Azevedo et al, 2014; 2017; Gaston et al, 2021).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Community Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for district and community nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month